Friday, April 08, 2005

Can YOU Spell Xenophobia?

Townhall is having a pledge drive, and since, as you know, Conservatives have aready been giving so much of their money to the poor already this year, what with the tsunami and the Feed Terri Now drive and every thing, well!

Kathleen has to convince them to give even more money to Townhall.

So she pens a fine little screed about what will happen if Townhall doesn't stay in business.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050407.shtml

It's the Conservative's Worst Nightmare:

Michael Moore will make a documentary about sex on America’s college campuses. He will film it at your daughter’s school. He will try to date your daughter. PETA will paint a red bulls-eye on your front door to indicate that you are a family of carnivores who probably own fur wraps. The Rev. Jesse Jackson will come to your house and pray while trying to hold your hand....
Your doctor will be named Mohammed Yousef Jabar, not that there’s anything wrong with that, but he will not be a legal citizen of the U.S. Also he will not speak English. Nor will increasing numbers of Americans as the illegal alien population continues to grow. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, though you will have to learn Spanish, whether you want to or not.


This last one, by the way? A major complaint of my students. God forbid they learn another language. They're Americans, gosh darn it! Why should they have to speak them furrin languages! If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for them! Let the furriners learn English, damn lazy dirty so and sos...

More on Jonah's Smackdown

Over at Lawyer's, Guns, and Money, Robert Farley points out a few other weak points in Jonah's "take down" of Krugman's column:

http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2005/04/grak-choking-on-my-own-incomprehension.html

Book Meme

I'm playing the Book Meme that's going around -- I got it from Pandagon, where I'm been getting nearly everything these days:

http://www.pandagon.net/


You're stuck inside Fahrenheit 451, which book do you want to be [saved]?

See, now, normally my response is Middlemarch, but no way could I memorize that sucker. (Don’t we have to memorize the books in F-451?) Maybe It Can’t Happen Here instead. (Or am I just saying that because it’s happening here? Yes, probably.)

Well, what about Le Guin’s The Dispossessed? Yes, I think I’d be/save that one. It would be a bear to memorize, but I would love to have it in my head, so yeah. I’d go for that.

Have you ever had a crush on a fictional character?

Oh, every week. Will Ladislaw, last month, when I was teaching Middlemarch for the tenth time. I had a deep and wild crush on the private detective Jackson Brodie in Kate Atkinson’s novel Case Histories (which is pretty good, BTW, have a look at it if you have time) that lasted about a month. And of course, as a kid, all I ever loved were people in books. Why else would I be doing what I do?

The last book you bought is?

Fiction or non-fiction? Yesterday I bought a second-hand copy, online from Alibris, of In the Garden of Iden, by Kage Baker, so I guess that’s the last book I bought. Right before that I bought Anne Lamott’s Plan B. I bought some critical stuff in Indianapolis for a paper I might be working on and we bought that book by Sarah Vowell on CD to listen to, Assassianation Vacation…I don’t buy clothes or furniture or shoes or lunch out or a decent car (as you’ll remember from my lengthy whine a few weeks back) but I do buy books. Sigh.

What are you currently reading?

For teaching purposes: Dracula and Paradise Lost. For my own amusement, Kage Baker (her complete oeuvre) and John Varley, The Golden Globe. Well, we can also call these last two research – I’m going to teach a science fiction class this summer: so I need to be reading in the field. Right? Right?

Five books you would take to a deserted island?

God. Five? Only five?

I wouldn’t go. Sorry. Book someone else.

In case the above hasn’t made it clear, I’m a book junkie. I have cards to three different libraries in the area and I visit them all at least once every week. (I pay fees for two of them because I don’t live in their counties – did you know you can do that? You can. It’s only $25.00 a year, which is a bargain, really.) When I get down to only three books in the house that I haven’t read, actual panic sets in. Hyper focus and dry mouth and fury: I have to get to a library – or, failing that, a bookstore – NOW. (Fort Smith, I might add, has no actual bookstore. A Books-A-Million, and, to give its owners credit, the best Books-A-Million I have ever been in, but, uh, really that’s not saying much; and a Hastings, ditto and ditto; and a tiny tiny Walden in our lame, lame mall.)

Anyway, if I can’t have a large and well-stocked library on my deserted island, along with UPS service so that I can order new books on a regular basis, is what I’m saying, bugger off.

delagar can't take it

The young man to whom kid has been engaged for the past several years (since they were sixteen months old and three years old, respectively) and to whom, at the ripe age of six (nearly seven, as she keeps reminding me) she is still intended, though there was that crisis a few weeks back, when Miles (not his real name) was approached with an offer of marriage by some strumpet in his pre-school class at the First Memorial Pre-School and Daycare in Greenwood, Arkansas – but he turned her down, telling her his heart belonged to another, so that was all right – in any case, as I was saying, Miles, for his fourth birthday? A few days ago? was given, by his loving grandparents, one of those battery-operated vehicles that four year olds can drive around the landscape by themselves, vroom-vroom, meep-meep, it’s very amusing, but it has led to me hearing the sentence that no parent ever wants to hear come out of their daughter’s mouth:

“I have a boyfriend,” she suddenly cried from the backseat yesterday. “And he can drive!”

Thursday, April 07, 2005

Heh

Little Jonah tries to do a smack-down of Krugman, but Jesse over at Pandagon rips him a new one here:

http://www.pandagon.net/mtarchives/004925.html#more

Jonah's main thesis (which he can't remember for two consecutive paragraphs, as Jesse points out) is that Conservatives are too smart and talented and noble to go into the Academy; only losers and egomanics (that is to say, liberals) would want to be university professors; but nevertheless that's not why there are so many liberals among the ranks of university professors.

Nay! It is because liberals are mean evil losers! Who won't let conservatives be the professors they, uh, don't want to be. Or something.

And there isn't either anything called the Academic Bill of Rights! That's a big lie! Shut up! Don't look over there at Horowitz buzzing around the country pushing it! Don't look at all the conservative blogs cheering for it! Don't look at all the legislatures passing bills about it! What are you talking about? It doesn't exist!

Ooo! Look! Terri Shiavo!

What a fuckwit.

Ironic

So this morning I'm feeding the kid her Cheerios and milk and polishing my shoes and saying, as I say almost every morning, "Would you hurry up, because if we don't leave this house in exactly two minutes we're going to be late for school and then Ms. Feldman (the head of the Montessori school) is going to yell at us, do you want Ms. Feldman yelling at us? Huh?"

She's busy reading the Cheerios box and telling me that it will help lower her cholesterol level and that it's part of a healthy diet and the perfect finger food.

"Fine. Could you just eat it?"

She takes a bite. She chews. She says, "Do you think I'm chubby?"

Did I mention the kid is six? She's six, and she's already obsessing about whether or not she weighs too much. What a fucked society we have.

I look at her. "Where's that coming from?"

"Well, my belly does stick out."

"Is this coming from some kid at school?"

She hesitates. Then she says, "No."

In a way that absolutely means yes, I suspect.

Anyway, I explained to her that she is six, and at six all kids' bellies stick out -- they are designed to stick out. I told her to look at her best friend, a skinny little boy. "Doesn't his belly stick out?" I inquired. I told her that, by the way, it didn't even matter whether her belly stuck out or not: it mattered whether she was doing a good job of mending the world or not. I told her people in this country spent way too much time obsessing about the shape of their bellies, time they ought to give to far mor useful pursuits, and did she want to spend her life focusing on how chubby she was or wasn't, or did she want to spend her life on reading and making up songs and becoming a scientist and painting pictures? (All her current interests.)

"Yeah," she says, "but what if I get so fat I can't get in the house anymore?"

Ai.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

More from Riverbend

Riverbend had more news from Iraq.

http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/

I especially recommend the post from March 23, where she talks about her memories of the start of the Iraqi war:

The faces in the safe room were white with tension. My cousin’s wife sat in the corner, a daughter on either side, her arms around their shoulders, murmuring prayers softly. My cousin was pacing in front of the safe room door, looking grim and my father was trying to find a decent radio station on the small AM/FM radio he carried around wherever he went. My aunt was hyperventilating at this point and my mother sat next to her, trying to distract her with the voice of the guy on the radio talking about the rain of bombs on Baghdad. A seemingly endless 40 minutes later, there was a slight lull in the bombing- it seemed to have gotten further away.

I took advantage of the relative calm and went to find the telephone. The house was cold because the windows were open to keep them from shattering. I reached for the telephone, fully expecting to find it dead but I was amazed to find a dial tone. I began dialing numbers- friends and relatives. We contacted an aunt and an uncle in other parts of Baghdad and the voices on the other end were shaky and wary. “Are you OK? Is everyone OK?” Was all I could ask on the phone. They were ok… but the bombing was heavy all over Baghdad. Shock and awe had begun.

More on Horowitz

Krugman had an editorial, which I somehow missed -- but dr. b didn't. I love that dr. b.

Anyway, I'm linking to her, b/c she does better links than I do, and you should read the whole thing, but here's my favorite bit of the editorial:

Consider the statements of Dennis Baxley, a Florida legislator who has sponsored a bill that - like similar bills introduced in almost a dozen states - would give students who think that their conservative views aren't respected the right to sue their professors. Mr. Baxley says that he is taking on "leftists" struggling against "mainstream society," professors who act as "dictators" and turn the classroom into a "totalitarian niche." His prime example of academic totalitarianism? When professors say that evolution is a fact.

In its April Fools' Day issue, Scientific American published a spoof editorial in which it apologized for endorsing the theory of evolution just because it's "the unifying concept for all of biology and one of the greatest scientific ideas of all time," saying that "as editors, we had no business being persuaded by mountains of evidence." And it conceded that it had succumbed "to the easy mistake of thinking that scientists understand their fields better than, say, U.S. senators or best-selling novelists do."

The editorial was titled "O.K., We Give Up." But it could just as well have been called "Why So Few Scientists Are Republicans These Days." Thirty years ago, attacks on science came mostly from the left; these days, they come overwhelmingly from the right, and have the backing of leading Republicans.

Scientific American may think that evolution is supported by mountains of evidence, but President Bush declares that "the jury is still out." Senator James Inhofe dismisses the vast body of research supporting the scientific consensus on climate change as a "gigantic hoax." And conservative pundits like George Will write approvingly about Michael Crichton's anti-environmentalist fantasies.

Think of the message this sends: today's Republican Party - increasingly dominated by people who believe truth should be determined by revelation, not research - doesn't respect science, or scholarship in general. It shouldn't be surprising that scholars have returned the favor by losing respect for the Republican Party.


http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/2005/04/random-linkage.html

Bumper Sticker Fun

My intrepid reporter in the field reports to me on a bumper sticker she saw this morning:

Give War a Chance

Isn't that just so cute?

Because -- heaven knows -- we really, really, really just haven't given war enough of a chance yet. We need to try it out some more.

Free America

Granted, this was not such a bright move on the teacher's part -- and I don't think I myself would have done it, given that a soldier fighting a war has enough problems -- but what sort of lesson has been taught to these students?

Teacher apologizes for kids’ anti-war letters
Air Force Times
By Karen Jowers
Times staff writer

New York City education officials have apologized to a 20-year-old Army private after a sixth-grade social studies class in Brooklyn sent him a batch of letters criticizing U.S. troops, the war in Iraq and President Bush.

After Pfc. Rob Jacobs received the letters in South Korea from 11- and 12-year-olds in early January, he called his father.

“He was very upset,” said Rob Jacobs Sr. of Middletown, N.J. About nine of the 21 letters were filled with anti-Iraq war diatribes and were critical of troops, accusing them of killing Iraqi civilians and even predicting very few troops would come home alive. The soldier wanted to call the children’s teacher, but his father had a different idea — he called the New York Post, which broke the story Feb. 21 and printed excerpts from some of the letters.

^snip^

Michele Higgins, a New York City Department of Education spokeswoman, said the teacher, Alex Kunhardt, has taken full responsibility and has received an official letter of reprimand.

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t71282.html


[Hat tip to one of my students, recently returned from Iraq]

Don't Go Talking Truth Out There

Michelle Malkin and Powerline and others on the right seem to be upset at the results of the Pulitzer committee’s choices – specifically, that the Pulitzer Prize committee dared to award prizes without consulting the Right Wing Party Line. Imagine!

For instance, the Pulitzer prize went to these photographs –

http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2005/breaking-news-photography/works/

-- which actually reported on the war, rather than to this one (Malkin’s choice):

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002003.htm

-- which, while I wish to take nothing away from this soldier, attempts to turn him into a kind of War/Cowboy icon. This is War Photography as advertising: the soldier as Marlboro Man.

The thing that has been missing from this war, which was present during Vietnam, is photography of the war – or at least dissemination of that photography. How many photographs do we see of the war in Iraq? Of wounded soldiers? Of body bags? Of screaming children and howling mothers and shattered buildings and burning streets?

And when we do see these things, what does Malkin do? She complains:

Equally telling is what the photos [that won the Pulitzer] don't show:
• US forces looking heroic: 0
• US forces helping Iraqi civillians[sic]: 0
• Iraqis expressing support for US forces: 0
• Iraqis expressing opposition to insurgents: 0

From the Winger point of view, that is the job of our press: to be a force for propaganda. To convince us, the American public, that the US forces are heroic, that they help Iraqi civilians, that the Iraqi civilians supports us, and that the Iraqis do not support the insurgents. Any member of the US Press that doesn’t do that, says Malkin and her ilk, doesn’t deserve to be winning any prizes.

That’s where Malkin and I have to disagree, I guess. Because I believe the job of the guy with the camera is to show what is actually going on: to tell the truth.

And if the war is a lie, and if kids are getting killed, and if insurgents are shooting poll workers, hey, Malkin? I think the guy with the camera needs to show the American public pictures of that. Not pictures of American soldiers looking heroic and American soldiers driving tanks and Iraqi women with purple fingers. No matter how cozy and warm that might make folks in the Red States feel.

Oh – and as Tbogg (http://tbogg.blogspot.com/) pointed out, we also have Powerline getting all upset over these editorial cartoons winning, because they’re not Winger cartoons:

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/2005_04.php#010077

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

From dr. b's site

So don't blame me -- but this is too funny:

Mr. B.: I have to run and go pick up pseudonymous kid at school.
Me: Ok, cool, see you later. Oh, by the way, the radio says the pope just died.
Mr. B.: And there is no heaven. Bet he was shocked.

Please address all hate mail to Mr. B., c/o Bitch Ph.D. Thank you.

http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/

Heaven -- or HELL?

Passing through that Red State, we kept seeing these giant billboards looming over cities, billboards that looked just like street signs, same fonts and all, same green background: all they said was JESUS.

No idea what that's about. This is JESUS town, maybe?

Anyway, here's a nice binary tract for you, with some nice subtle hate in it. Check out the guys in the panel about the religion that rejects JESUS: bit anti-Semitic, hmm, Jack?

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1021/1021_01.asp#chick

But don't worry, he has plenty of hate for other religions later on. (Keep going, to the end of the comix!) Not his fault, though. He's supposed to hate the rest of us! JESUS told him to! Cause we're all going to HELL, after all, and if he doesn't tell us we're evil, well, how would we know?

Book Review

Driving to the conference in Indianapolis, we listened to Sarah Vowell’s Assassination Vacation on CD.

http://www.americamagazine.org/BookReview.cfm?articleTypeID=31&textID=4108&issueID=526

It’s a fine book to listen to while you’re driving to and from a Red State – and while your country is behaving badly in yet another stupid war. The section on McKinley and his Philippines exploits was especially piquant.

(For more on that: http://hnn.us/articles/1595.html)

Monday, April 04, 2005

Back from the Red State

I’m back from Indianapolis, which is – yow – you want to talk Red States? I though I was living in a Red State, here in Northwest Arkansas, but apparently we are just sort of pale mauve. Indiana is what real Red is like.

Not that they aren’t nice folk. They’re right nice, those Red State Folk. So long as you don’t cross’em.

Everyone at our hotel was relentlessly polite, the saleswoman at the Talbot’s, where I bought the shirt I needed to present in, was chatty and sweet, and at the conference hotel (we didn’t stay there, too pricey), all the staff was helpful and kind, though they would not, no matter how we angled the matter, give us free broadband wireless connection for our laptop. (Rats.)

The number and sheer size of War Monuments* – that was the first thing that struck us about Indianapolis.

One war monument after the next, as we drove down Meridian Avenue. To the World War, said one. To the War of 1893, said another – I think (it was rainy and cold and the print was in stone and hard to read, despite the immense size of the monument).

Then a big Greek temple of a monument to warriors of some war, or maybe all wars.

Then a war circle – an actual circle, in the middle of the city, which all traffic must go around, with a giant angel atop it, with a flaming sword, and a flaming torch. I don’t know which war that was to. Maybe a general celebration of war? Yay War? I do not know. But the Angel stood on a Temple atop a giant Parthenon atop an immense marble hummock, and every day as we drove past it swarms of tourists were clambering around it like ants, worshipping the effigy of war, loving the celebration of destruction and death – I don’t know, it just made me edgy.

Then, too, we ate lunch one afternoon, between conference sessions, at Johnny Rocket’s. Most of the waiters and staff were very nice. As I’ve said, most of the people in Indianapolis were nice as pie. But with my hamburger? I ordered French fries.

“I’ll have a hamburger and French fries,” I said.

The waiter gave me a stern look. “American fries,” he snapped.

I looked up at him. “What?”

“We sell American fries here, m’am.”

Which I guess I ought to have know, by the giant American flag they had hanging from the back of their store.

The other thing I noticed about Indiana was the sheer wealth of the place. All those wide farms, all those big elaborate farm houses – as big as small villages, some of them -- with their immense silos, all the tidy fences and vast tracts of green meadow and fields, the roads linking all of this, and every six miles, it seemed to me, another university. (And good universities, too: Indiana has at least three really good universities. Arkansas doesn't even have one.) The joke everyone knows about Arkansas is how we don’t wear shoes down here, ha ha ha. Very funny, right?

Well, guess why Arkies didn’t have shoes in all those pictures, folks? We’re fucking poor in this state.

I didn’t realize just how poor this state was until I was driving past all those rich farms in Indiana. I drive past Arkansas farms every day of my life – shabby, patched together places that have always looked normal to me, with tiny four-room houses huddled under cottonwood trees, or rusting single-wide trailers stuck next to the creek bed, fences made from a couple of strands of rusting wire, or split rail-- I always thought, well, of course farmers are poor. That's what you hear in the media, right? That's why farmers need subsidies, right? Cause they're so poor?

And in Arkansas, they are poor. I don't think they're getting many subsidies here either, though. Arkie farmers in the Ozark are scraping together a living out of cattle and chicken houses and the few flat arable acres. These farms look pretty pathetic next to those vast rich farms in Indiana.

Of course, one reason those farms are so wealthy, I suspect, has to do with those farm subsidies. And I suspect my students who come from those Arkie farms don’t qualify for that particular form of welfare.

So my students come down here, to my university, and try to learn to do something they can earn a living at – and how do they pay for it? (Because their parents certainly can’t afford to pay for it, not off what they’re earning on those scrappy little Arkie farms.) By joining the National Guard! And how does a grateful nation repay them?

Giant War Monuments in Indianapolis!

American Fries in Johnny Rockets!

An education at fine institution in the Ozarks!

And – when they graduate – if they do, if they aren’t killed in a useless war started for fictitious reasons by the worst president ever, what will they get? A job, do you think? A piece of the American pie? A share of those American fries?

Or will the worst president ever have destroyed the American economy entirely by then, as he seems entirely bent on doing?

American values -- that's what matters. Moral values: that's what we should vote for. Who cares whether things are, well, fair or not?

*Obligatory caveat: Of course I believe we should honor our war dead. Heavens yes. Not to mention the men and women in uniform who have and are defending our freedom now. But six monuments in the space of three blocks? One of them the size of an art museum? At the risk of making a hijus pun, can anyone spell overkill?